For every case in the podcast and the Fantasy League, we will provide a summary with important issues and what to worry about.
WHAT HAPPENED: In 2002, the Supreme Court held that States could not sentence a defendant to the death penalty if it was proven that defendant possessed intellectual disabilities. The Court did not set a standard for what qualifies as intellectual disabilities and left that decision to individual States.
WHY IS THIS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT: Texas uses a standard that is not just out-of-date, but it’s so out-of-date that the agency that created the standard has since disavowed it for being out-of-date. The Defendant in this case qualifies did not qualify under this standard, but presumably could qualify for a standard that is more in tune with modern practices.
WHAT ARE THE RAMIFICATIONS: There are three possible outcomes, with a modicum of fear-mongering sprinkled in.
(1) The Court does nothing and allows States to make whatever standards they want under this Rule. Without a floor, States could make the standard much higher and execute whomever they please.
(2) The Court refuses to set a national standard, but holds that picking a standard that is so antiquated that the people who made it publicly denounce their findings is not permitted. With no definitive standard, Texas picks a new standard that hasn’t been disavowed by its creator and we do this throughout infinity.
(3) The Court not only strikes the Texas standard, but also sets a requirement that all States must meet, thus substituting its judgment (which could be no more than five justices), for that of all fifty States. States with a lower standard are now required to redo their standards via legislative action, which at very least presses pause on the death penalty in more than a few jurisdictions.
ROOT FOR option 1 (Texas) if a proponent of executing people with a mental handicap.
ROOT FOR option 2 (Moore) if you are a proponent of stopping the execution of this particular defendant, but probably no one else.
ROOT FOR option 3 (Moore) if you are a proponent of no executions for people with a mental handicap, and/or the death penalty in general.
PREDICTION: Option 2 by a vote of 5-3
[…] insight displayed by Josh from Oregon and Austin from LA, who both nailed all the details in Moore v. Texas. A lot of folks out there who could gain massive amounts of points by filling out the past ballots. […]
LikeLike