Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Trump and the Travel Ban

Posted: May 20, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

Brett and Nazim celebrate their 200th episode (!!!) the only way they know how, by talking about food for way too long, going on a weird tangent about the Mueller investigation that dovetails into the shady side of corporate law, and finally landing on Trump v. Hawaii, the travel ban case that asks the Supreme Court to gauge how prejudiced the President is allowed to be before we do anything about it.  Law starts at (11:50).

New Episode!

Advertisements

Judge Dredd

Posted: May 13, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers judges, and more specifically judicial mistakes currently before the Supreme Court.  Brett and Nazim discuss Rosales-Mireles v. U.S, which basically covers how the Court should approach math problems, and Dalmazzi v. U.S., which discusses the current applicability of Civil War military appointment statutes.  Law starts at (04:30).

New Episode!

Interesting Things the Week After 4/20

Posted: May 6, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers oral arguments and recent decisions with varying degrees of stakes.  Brett and Nazim discuss Abbott v. Perez (which might decide the fate of modern democracy) Jesner v. Arab Bank PLC (which may facilitate terrorism), SAS Institute v. Matal (which deals with paperwork), and Trump v. Hawaii (which has something to do with the President).  Law starts at (04:18).

New Episode!

Image result for justice john roberts

Enclosed are results follows SAS Intitute and Jesner.  We did not have Dimaya on the ballot, so that did not count. From what I have read from my sources (the Scotusblog twitter account), results will begin again May 15 and then come fast and furious.

170         Holy shit, my friend Ray

165         Hollywood Austin

135        DC Alyssa

125         Vito

                Adam in Rodchester

115         Brian S.

110         Mitchel

                Coridan the Arch-Villain

105         Will P.

100         Brett

                Ken H.

95           Nazim

                Dan H.

90           Steven from Houston

                Andy the Wholeman

                KC (“the Kid”)

85           Penni

                Anthony from Georgia

                Tony C.

80           Daniela

                Max “Number 2”

75           Big Bears Dad

70           Arturo

                Neil R.

                Fabian

                Todd S.

                Spencer

                “Doing It Wrong”

60           LA Scott

                Silvia

55           C3PO

                P Dub

                Kyle WM

45           Emma

                Prosecutor John

                My dude keanuthon

                Lane from Philadelphia

40           Michigan Drew 

                Cade

                James N

30           ZLM

                KJ

                Denver Brad

                Lauren from Baltimore

25           Zoe

                Wayned

                Sarah Corp.

                Girl Carew

15           Victor

                JB in ME

                Jocelyn

                Shannon

                Kevin, aka Havertown’s worst gambler

                David from ATL

0              Dan H.

                Nora

                Brandon N.

                Young Maldy

                Cam from Phoenix

                CB

                JB94

Decisions in Microsoft and Dimaya

Posted: April 29, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers two recent decisions by the Court, including Microsoft v. U.S. (where the Court determined the dispute was moot after passage of the CLOUD Act), and Dimaya v. Sessions (where the Court invalidated the Immigrant Removal Act on grounds of vagueness under the Due Process Clause).  Law starts at (08:48), but you’d be missing some pretty dope NASA talk.

New Episode!

How Punk Rock Is It To Sue the Government?

Posted: April 22, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

Maybe a 6 out of 10?  Depends on how you feel about lawsuits destined to fail, since this week we are covering sovereign immunity and the inherently futility of trying to hold the government accountable for bad actions.  Brett and Nazim discuss the cases of Kisela v. Hughes (do police get qualified immunity for shooting people?) and Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (can the government stop your free speech rights by arresting you if you kind of deserve to be arrested).  Law starts at (05:50).

New Episode!

Double Double Toil & Trouble

Posted: April 15, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers double jeopardy, a legal concept that should be easy, but technical legal rules have made complicated and kind of boring.  To that end(!!), Brett and Nazim spice up the case of Currier v. Virginia, where the Court has to determine whether a severed charge can be tried following an acquittal.  Law starts at (07:09), but before them Nazim talks about how he thinks he could be the Bachelor, sooooooooo skip at your own peril.

New Episode!

Family Court War Stories

Posted: April 8, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode tackles the wild and unpredictable world of Family Court, where everyone is nuts and there are no rules.  Brett and Nazim cover the case of Sveen v. Melin, where the Court is asked whether a revocation upon divorce statute automatically changes a life insurance beneficiary retroactively, or if people have to still do it themselves.  Law starts at (06:00).

New Episode!

A Heaping Buffet of Precedent Talk

Posted: April 1, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode, which was intended to a brief discussion on Hughes v. U.S. to compensate for Brett’s lost voice, quickly turned into a more substantive discussion on plurality opinions, sentencing guidelines and actual buffets.  So the title isn’t really a joke, cuz like the last ten minutes is legit all about buffets.  The law starts at (03:36), but if you hate food talk, feel free to bail around the time Brett talks about eating oysters at the Chinese buffet.

New Episode!

The Fact Act Gets Wacked??

Posted: March 25, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

First off, this week’s episode covers the case of National Institute of Family and Life Advocate v. Becerra, which decides whether or not a California Statute (the FACT Act) that requires specific disclosures of Reproductive Family Centers violates the First Amendment.  Brett and Nazim have a brief crash course on general abortion rights under the Constitution and then cover why the statute may end up a 1-1 tie.  Secondly, I think we did a really good job with the title of the podcast this week.  Law starts at (03:11).

New Episode!