Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Supreme Court Sesame Street

Posted: January 14, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

“V” is the letter of the day today, as we are covering VOCABULARY this week on the Citizen’s Guide to the Supreme Court.  Brett and Nazim cover three current cases which debate the meanings of statutory text, including Murphy v. Smith (how much is 25%?), Digital Realty Trust v. Somers (what is a whistle blower?), and SAS Institute v. Matal (what is a final written decision?).  Law starts at (04:25).

New Episode!

Advertisements

Just Get a Damn Warrant

Posted: January 7, 2018 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers the Fourth Amendment, and specifically why police officers should err on the side of getting a a warrant to avoid cases being taken to the Supreme Court.  Brett and Nazim cover Collins v. Virgnia and Byrd v. U.S. (starting at 19:20), but not before discussing the Constitutionality of anti-homeless legislation (starting at 5:47) and why the Benjamin Button movie sucks (that’s from the jump, homie).

New Episode!

WWJND (What Would Judge Neil Do)?

Posted: December 31, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

We’re going back in time a bit this week to cover the cases of Sessions v. Dimaya and Jennings v. Rodriguez to discuss how Judge Neil’s originalist sensibilities will impact two cases from last term that deal with immigration removal statutes.  Additionally, Brett laments the loss of Carson Wentz and predicts hell fire and brimstone if the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  Law starts at (04:42).

New Episode!

Holiday Mailbag Episode

Posted: December 22, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

In this holiday mailbag episode, Brett and Nazim debate the Establishment Clause, answer listener questions, and talk about why eggnog is gross.  Happy holidays, and we will see you next Sunday.

New Episode!

The Gang Solves the Masterpiece Cakes Crisis

Posted: December 17, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission and specifically the oral arguments that took place a week ago and terrified everyone of the outcome.  Brett and Nazim take the approach of trying to find a compromise for this case that will (1) not invalidate all discrimination laws, and (2) not result in people ordering offensive cakes to prove a point.  It’s a delicate balance that hopefully the Court will handle more efficiently.  Case in point, law starts at (03:04).

New Episode!

Alien v. Predator, Inc.

Posted: December 10, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers the Alien Tort Statute and the current case of Jesner v. Arab Bank, which covers whether a corporations can be liable under said Alien Tort Statute.  Brett and Nazim also relish their Web 100 nomination by the ABA and discuss the appropriate amount of relishing one should do when reading about attorneys getting disciplined.  Law starts at (05:50).

New Episode!

Guilty Pleas and Thank Yous

Posted: December 3, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers guilty pleas, from the practical (why the ubiquity of guilty pleas makes sense but mostly furthers the unfairness of the criminal justice system), to the theoretical (the current case of Class v. U.S., which broadly covers whether a guilty plea waives your right to challenge the Constitutionality of the underlying charge).  Law starts at (03:50).

New Episode!

Thanksgiving Mailbag Episode

Posted: November 22, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

To celebrate arguably the best holiday, Brett and Nazim take listener questions about who would be the worst judicial Thanksgiving Day guest, Presidential Turkey Pardons, and actual legal questions at the end.  Happy Thanksgiving; and otherwise, we will see you next week.

New Episode!

Who Let the Lawyer Dawgs Out?

Posted: November 19, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers Miranda Rights, from the ridiculous (the Louisiana Supreme Court holding that a defendant’s request for a “lawyer, dog” was not an equivocal invocation of Miranda rights) to the sublime (City of Hayes v. Vogt in which a police officer’s incriminating statements in a job interview were used against him in a pretrial hearing).  The law starts from the beginning, but Vogt specifically starts at (24:43).

New Episode!

Citizen’s Guide to House Parties

Posted: November 12, 2017 by Nazim in Uncategorized

This week’s episode covers District of Columbia v. Wesby, a case that appears super interesting at a surface level (house-parties, cops, possible strippers), but is sort of boring a few meters deep (probable cause, qualified immunity, mens rea).  Brett and Nazim get into the details, but not before breaking out a 8 movie bracket to determine the best house party movie of all time.  Law starts at (03:40), House Party nonsense from (11:19-23:05).

New Episode!