This week’s episode covers Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission and specifically the oral arguments that took place a week ago and terrified everyone of the outcome. Brett and Nazim take the approach of trying to find a compromise for this case that will (1) not invalidate all discrimination laws, and (2) not result in people ordering offensive cakes to prove a point. It’s a delicate balance that hopefully the Court will handle more efficiently. Case in point, law starts at (03:04).
Comments
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court 
Question about baker and his business. Would it matter if the baker didn’t make baked goods for all “Christian sins”. Refusing cakes for adulterers or thieves or murderers or the other commandments. If they just deny this “sin” but make cakes for other “sins” doesn’t that undermine their argument that this really isn’t a religious issue.
LikeLike